Evidence found
399 records across 6 countries and territories, 1882–2026.
Eumomota superciliosa · GBIF taxon key 2475276
Where has the Turquoise-browed Motmot been recorded?
Eumomota superciliosa occurrence evidence comes from 399 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1882 to 2026. Most records come from Mexico.
- 399 records
- 6 places
- 69 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18822026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Turquoise-browed Motmot has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Turquoise-browed Motmot. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 132 | |
| Costa Rica | 96 | |
| El Salvador | 75 | |
| Honduras | 57 | |
| Nicaragua | 26 | |
| Guatemala | 13 |
Related animals
Others in the family Momotidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.