Evidence found
1,629 records across 12 countries and territories, 1879–2026.
Pipra erythrocephala · GBIF taxon key 2487629
Where has the Golden-headed Manakin been recorded?
Pipra erythrocephala occurrence evidence comes from 1,629 records in 12 countries and territories, from 1879 to 2026. Most records come from Colombia.
- 1,629 records
- 12 places
- 95 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-21. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18792026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Golden-headed Manakin has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Golden-headed Manakin. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 778 | |
| Peru | 413 | |
| Guyana | 91 | |
| Brazil | 79 | |
| Venezuela | 79 | |
| Suriname | 68 | |
| Ecuador | 53 | |
| Panama | 37 | |
| Trinidad & Tobago | 23 | |
| French Guiana | 3 | |
| ZZ | 3 | |
| Costa Rica | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Pipridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.