Evidence found
42 records across 6 countries and territories, 1911–2022.
Dyaphorophyia castanea · GBIF taxon key 5789252
Where has the Chestnut Wattle-eye been recorded?
Dyaphorophyia castanea occurrence evidence comes from 42 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1911 to 2022. Most records come from Equatorial Guinea.
- 42 records
- 6 places
- 9 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
6 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19112022
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Chestnut Wattle-eye has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Chestnut Wattle-eye. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Equatorial Guinea | 24 | |
| Angola | 6 | |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 4 | |
| DR Congo | 3 | |
| Uganda | 3 | |
| Benin | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Platysteiridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.