Evidence found
63 records across 2 countries and territories, 1917–2026.
Turdoides affinis · GBIF taxon key 2493324
Where has the Yellow-billed Babbler been recorded?
Turdoides affinis occurrence evidence comes from 63 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1917 to 2026. Most records come from India.
- 63 records
- 2 places
- 19 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: August.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: August. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19172026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Yellow-billed Babbler has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Yellow-billed Babbler. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Leiothrichidae.
Jungle Babbler
773 records
Arrow-marked Babbler
301 records
Chinese Hwamei
129 records
Brown Babbler
112 records
Common Babbler
101 records
Rufous Sibia
97 records
Chestnut-crowned Laughingthrush
90 records
Striated Laughingthrush
62 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.