Evidence found
30 records across 5 countries and territories, 1909–2025.
Telophorus cruentus · GBIF taxon key 6100952
Where has the Rosy-patched Bushshrike been recorded?
Telophorus cruentus occurrence evidence comes from 30 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1909 to 2025. Most records come from Kenya.
- 30 records
- 5 places
- 18 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
11 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19092025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Rosy-patched Bushshrike has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rosy-patched Bushshrike. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Malaconotidae.
Black-crowned Tchagra
1,402 records
Black-backed Puffback
1,048 records
Black-headed Gonolek
436 records
Ethiopian Boubou
397 records
Southern Boubou
359 records
Northern Puffback
258 records
Orange-breasted Bushshrike
201 records
Bokmakierie
181 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.