Evidence found
7 records across 4 countries and territories, 1918–2024.
Aceros nipalensis · GBIF taxon key 5228459
Where has the Rufous-necked Hornbill been recorded?
Aceros nipalensis occurrence evidence comes from 7 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1918 to 2024. Most records come from Bhutan.
- 7 records
- 4 places
- 5 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19182024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Rufous-necked Hornbill has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rufous-necked Hornbill. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Bucerotidae.
African Gray Hornbill
415 records
Crowned Hornbill
343 records
Black-and-white-casqued Hornbill
311 records
Trumpeter Hornbill
235 records
Southern Yellow-billed Hornbill
226 records
Oriental Pied-Hornbill
168 records
Southern Red-billed Hornbill
165 records
African Pied Hornbill
143 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.