Evidence found
191 records across 9 countries and territories, 1922–2026.
Aegithalos concinnus · GBIF taxon key 2494998
Where has the Black-throated Tit been recorded?
Aegithalos concinnus occurrence evidence comes from 191 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1922 to 2026. Most records come from China.
- 191 records
- 9 places
- 36 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19222026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Black-throated Tit has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Black-throated Tit. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| China | 111 | |
| India | 47 | |
| Taiwan | 16 | |
| Nepal | 6 | |
| Pakistan | 3 | |
| Vietnam | 3 | |
| Bhutan | 2 | |
| Laos | 2 | |
| Thailand | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Aegithalidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.