Evidence found
130 records across 4 countries and territories, 1990–2019.
Afrixalus laevis · GBIF taxon key 2426577
Where has the Smooth Spiny Reed Frog been recorded?
Afrixalus laevis occurrence evidence comes from 130 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2019. Most records come from Equatorial Guinea.
- 130 records
- 4 places
- 10 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19902019
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Smooth Spiny Reed Frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Smooth Spiny Reed Frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Equatorial Guinea | 86 | |
| Uganda | 22 | |
| Cameroon | 14 | |
| DR Congo | 8 |
Related animals
Others in the family Hyperoliidae.
Moller's Gulf Frog
877 records
Golden-eyed Reed Frog
579 records
Drewes' Reed Frog
405 records
Seychelles Island Frog
11 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.