Evidence found
173 records across 5 countries and territories, 1895–2026.
Ameiva bifrontata · GBIF taxon key 2472186
Where has the Khaki ameiva been recorded?
Ameiva bifrontata occurrence evidence comes from 173 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1895 to 2026. Most records come from Colombia.
- 173 records
- 5 places
- 33 years recorded
- Squamata class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18952026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Khaki ameiva has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Khaki ameiva. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 79 | |
| Venezuela | 41 | |
| Peru | 37 | |
| Aruba | 14 | |
| Netherlands | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Teiidae.
Common Ameiva
361 records
Anguilla Bank Ameiva
313 records
Common Puerto Rican Ameiva
281 records
Dominica Groundlizard
14 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.