Evidence found
110 records across 4 countries and territories, 1879–1987.
Ameiva erythrocephala · GBIF taxon key 11155676
Where has the Red-faced groundlizard been recorded?
Ameiva erythrocephala occurrence evidence comes from 110 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1879 to 1987. Most records come from Netherlands.
- 110 records
- 4 places
- 6 years recorded
- Squamata class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18791987
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Red-faced groundlizard has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Red-faced groundlizard. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 93 | |
| St Kitts & Nevis | 9 | |
| ZZ | 7 | |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Teiidae.
Common Ameiva
361 records
Anguilla Bank Ameiva
313 records
Common Puerto Rican Ameiva
281 records
Dominica Groundlizard
14 records
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.