Evidence found
88 records across 1 countries and territories, 1969–2022.
Apodemus gurkha · GBIF taxon key 5219738
Where has the Nepalese Field Mouse been recorded?
Apodemus gurkha occurrence evidence comes from 88 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1969 to 2022. Most records come from Nepal.
- 88 records
- 1 places
- 3 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Nepalese Field Mouse has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Nepalese Field Mouse. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Nepal | 88 |
Related animals
Others in the family Muridae.
house mouse
26,983 records
black rat
11,025 records
Coucha Rat
6,522 records
Yellow-necked Mouse
4,544 records
Jackson's Praomys
3,065 records
African Arvicanthis
3,051 records
Typical Lemniscomys
2,443 records
Gracile Tateril
2,200 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.