Evidence found
294 records across 6 countries and territories, 1962–2017.
Arizelocichla nigriceps · GBIF taxon key 7340426
Where has the Eastern Mountain-Greenbul been recorded?
Arizelocichla nigriceps occurrence evidence comes from 294 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1962 to 2017. Most records come from Uganda.
- 294 records
- 6 places
- 19 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19622017
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Eastern Mountain-Greenbul has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Eastern Mountain-Greenbul. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Pycnonotidae.
Brown-eared Bulbul
35,719 records
Common Bulbul
3,905 records
Red-vented Bulbul
2,167 records
Light-vented Bulbul
1,086 records
Yellow-vented Bulbul
871 records
Little Greenbul
851 records
Sombre Greenbul
824 records
Red-whiskered Bulbul
809 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.