What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Flat-faced Fruit-eating Bat been recorded?

Artibeus planirostris occurrence evidence comes from 1,670 records in 14 countries and territories, from 1892 to 2026. Most records come from Peru.

MammaliaChiropteraPhyllostomidaeArtibeus

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

1,670 records across 14 countries and territories, 1892–2026.

Artibeus planirostris · GBIF taxon key 2433271

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-21. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: August.

12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: August. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18922026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Flat-faced Fruit-eating Bat has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Flat-faced Fruit-eating Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Peru 538
Bolivia 456
Colombia 179
Venezuela 114
Trinidad & Tobago 101
Guyana 69
Brazil 64
Ecuador 64
Argentina 58
Suriname 10
St Vincent & the Grenadines 7
Paraguay 4
Grenada 3
French Guiana 3

Related animals

Others in the family Phyllostomidae.

Seba's Short-tailed Bat
Seba's Short-tailed Bat
10,070 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.