Evidence found
250,808 records across 3 countries and territories, 1857–2026.
Baeolophus bicolor · GBIF taxon key 2487887
Where has the Tufted Titmouse been recorded?
Baeolophus bicolor occurrence evidence comes from 250,808 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1857 to 2026. Most records come from United States.
- 250,808 records
- 3 places
- 157 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-20. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18572026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Tufted Titmouse has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Tufted Titmouse. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 250,484 | |
| Canada | 293 | |
| Mexico | 31 |
Related animals
Others in the family Paridae.
Great Tit
2,468,098 records
Eurasian Blue Tit
2,224,465 records
Coal Tit
512,510 records
Willow Tit
396,078 records
Crested Tit
330,176 records
Black-capped Chickadee
252,205 records
Carolina Chickadee
154,322 records
Boreal Chickadee
5,114 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.