Evidence found
441 records across 5 countries and territories, 1908–2026.
Boana pulchella · GBIF taxon key 10710561
Where has the Montevideo tree frog been recorded?
Boana pulchella occurrence evidence comes from 441 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1908 to 2026. Most records come from Argentina.
- 441 records
- 5 places
- 46 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
11 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19082026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Montevideo tree frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Montevideo tree frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Hylidae.
Common Tree Frog
11,504 records
Japanese Treefrog
723 records
Dominican Treefrog
353 records
Lemon-Yellow Tree Frog
153 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.