Evidence found
296 records across 10 countries and territories, 1909–2024.
Bradypterus cinnamomeus · GBIF taxon key 5231359
Where has the Cinnamon Bracken-Warbler been recorded?
Bradypterus cinnamomeus occurrence evidence comes from 296 records in 10 countries and territories, from 1909 to 2024. Most records come from Uganda.
- 296 records
- 10 places
- 35 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19092024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Cinnamon Bracken-Warbler has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Cinnamon Bracken-Warbler. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda | 123 | |
| Tanzania | 52 | |
| Rwanda | 35 | |
| Malawi | 31 | |
| Kenya | 30 | |
| DR Congo | 14 | |
| Sudan | 7 | |
| Burundi | 2 | |
| South Sudan | 1 | |
| Zambia | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Locustellidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.