Evidence found
10 records across 5 countries and territories, 1913–2020.
Bradysia ocellaris · GBIF taxon key 4520719
Where has the Dark-winged fungus gnat been recorded?
Bradysia ocellaris occurrence evidence comes from 10 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1913 to 2020. Most records come from Canada.
- 10 records
- 5 places
- 8 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: August.
5 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: August. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19132020
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Dark-winged fungus gnat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Dark-winged fungus gnat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | |
| United States | 3 | |
| Panama | 2 | |
| Austria | 1 | |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Sciaridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.