What Animal Lives Where

Where has the carabus auronitens been recorded?

Carabus auronitens occurrence evidence comes from 1,087 records in 13 countries and territories, from 1863 to 2026. Most records come from Austria.

InsectaColeopteraCarabidaeCarabus

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

1,087 records across 13 countries and territories, 1863–2026.

Carabus auronitens · GBIF taxon key 4470628

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.

10 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18632026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where carabus auronitens has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for carabus auronitens. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Austria 491
Switzerland 207
Luxembourg 105
Belgium 79
Germany 79
Sweden 44
France 38
Italy 26
Netherlands 10
Czechia 3
Poland 2
Slovakia 2
Ukraine 1

Related animals

Others in the family Carabidae.

Clivina consobrina
694 records
Clivina erythropyga
625 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.