Evidence found
6 records across 2 countries and territories, 1959–2023.
Cleora acaciaria · GBIF taxon key 11068881
Where has the Cleora acaciaria been recorded?
Cleora acaciaria occurrence evidence comes from 6 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1959 to 2023. Most records come from Réunion.
- 6 records
- 2 places
- 3 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
5 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Cleora acaciaria has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Cleora acaciaria. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Geometridae.
Riband Wave
29,697 records
Latticed Heath
26,998 records
Garden Carpet
18,734 records
Mottled Beauty
17,447 records
Willow Beauty
14,162 records
Brimstone Moth
13,662 records
Blood-vein
12,968 records
Double-striped Pug
11,711 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.