Evidence found
21 records across 2 countries and territories, 2005–2024.
Coris bulbifrons · GBIF taxon key 5209765
Where has the Double-header Wrasse been recorded?
Coris bulbifrons occurrence evidence comes from 21 records in 2 countries and territories, from 2005 to 2024. Most records come from Norfolk Island.
- 21 records
- 2 places
- 3 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Double-header Wrasse has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Double-header Wrasse. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Norfolk Island | 17 | |
| Australia | 4 |
Related animals
Others in the family Labridae.
Bluehead
117,127 records
saddle wrasse
18,996 records
Fivestripe wrasse
13,944 records
Goldsinny wrasse
13,221 records
Bird wrasse
10,017 records
Ornamental Wrasse
8,471 records
Checkerboard wrasse
6,643 records
Bluestreak cleaner wrasse
6,454 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.