What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Crispatotrochus rubescens been recorded?

Crispatotrochus rubescens occurrence evidence comes from 134 records in 10 countries and territories, from 1899 to 2011. Most records come from United States.

AnthozoaScleractiniaCaryophylliidaeCrispatotrochus

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

134 records across 10 countries and territories, 1899–2011.

Crispatotrochus rubescens · GBIF taxon key 2259052

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: August.

8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: August. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18992011

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Crispatotrochus rubescens has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Crispatotrochus rubescens. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
United States 44
Indonesia 35
Wallis & Futuna 21
Philippines 13
Palau 6
Vanuatu 6
New Caledonia 5
Taiwan 2
China 1
Kiribati 1

Related animals

Others in the family Caryophylliidae.

Conotrochus brunneus
400 records
Bourneotrochus stellulatus
153 records
Caryophyllia abrupta
115 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.