Evidence found
114 records across 4 countries and territories, 1964–2024.
Cryptospiza jacksoni · GBIF taxon key 2493693
Where has the Dusky Crimsonwing been recorded?
Cryptospiza jacksoni occurrence evidence comes from 114 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1964 to 2024. Most records come from Uganda.
- 114 records
- 4 places
- 19 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.
11 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19642024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Dusky Crimsonwing has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Dusky Crimsonwing. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Estrildidae.
Common Waxbill
3,015 records
Scaly-breasted Munia
1,717 records
Bronze mannikin
1,118 records
Red-cheeked Cordonbleu
841 records
Red-browed Firetail
628 records
Red-billed Firefinch
547 records
Java Sparrow
443 records
Green-winged Pytilia
371 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.