Evidence found
4 records across 1 countries and territories, 2020–2020.
Culicoides imicola · GBIF taxon key 1632059
Where has the Culicoides imicola been recorded?
Culicoides imicola occurrence evidence comes from 4 records in 1 countries and territories, from 2020 to 2020. Most records come from Thailand.
- 4 records
- 1 places
- 1 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
one-off describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Culicoides imicola has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Culicoides imicola. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 4 |
Related animals
Others in the family Ceratopogonidae.
Culicoides obsoletus
123 records
Culicoides pulicaris
62 records
Culicoides chiopterus
45 records
Culicoides dewulfi
31 records
Ceratopogon punctatus
22 records
Culicoides kibunensis
21 records
Culicoides delta
17 records
Culicoides newsteadi
9 records
Record pattern: one-off
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.