Evidence found
6 records across 1 countries and territories, 1908–2024.
Dicaeum maugei · GBIF taxon key 2484690
Where has the Red-chested Flowerpecker been recorded?
Dicaeum maugei occurrence evidence comes from 6 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1908 to 2024. Most records come from Indonesia.
- 6 records
- 1 places
- 4 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19082024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Red-chested Flowerpecker has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Red-chested Flowerpecker. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 6 |
Related animals
Others in the family Dicaeidae.
Orange-bellied Flowerpecker
390 records
Scarlet-backed Flowerpecker
154 records
Fire-breasted Flowerpecker
110 records
Red-keeled Flowerpecker
78 records
Midget Flowerpecker
71 records
Red-capped Flowerpecker
45 records
Scarlet-headed Flowerpecker
8 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.