What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Depressed Aquatic Leaf Beetle been recorded?

Donacia marginata occurrence evidence comes from 671 records in 16 countries and territories, from 1850 to 2026. Most records come from Sweden.

InsectaColeopteraChrysomelidaeDonacia

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

671 records across 16 countries and territories, 1850–2026.

Donacia marginata · GBIF taxon key 4461519

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.

4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18502026

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Depressed Aquatic Leaf Beetle has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Depressed Aquatic Leaf Beetle. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Sweden 370
United Kingdom 141
Netherlands 65
Latvia 32
Austria 15
Germany 10
France 10
Switzerland 6
Belgium 5
Luxembourg 5
Denmark 4
Ireland 2
Türkiye 2
Ukraine 2
Italy 1
Lithuania 1

Related animals

Others in the family Chrysomelidae.

Thomispa feae
Thomispa feae
254 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.