Evidence found
117 records across 2 countries and territories, 1866–2025.
Eleutherodactylus weinlandi · GBIF taxon key 2424037
Where has the Hispaniolan Red-rumped Frog been recorded?
Eleutherodactylus weinlandi occurrence evidence comes from 117 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1866 to 2025. Most records come from Dominican Republic.
- 117 records
- 2 places
- 14 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
5 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18662025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Hispaniolan Red-rumped Frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Hispaniolan Red-rumped Frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Dominican Republic | 116 | |
| Haiti | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Eleutherodactylidae.
Lesser Antillean whistling frog
1,353 records
Antillean Coqui
557 records
Martinique Robber frog
192 records
Virgin Islands Coqui
2 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.