What Animal Lives Where

Where has the smooth spooner been recorded?

Etisus laevimanus occurrence evidence comes from 482 records in 19 countries and territories, from 1891 to 2025. Most records come from Japan.

MalacostracaDecapodaXanthidaeEtisus

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

482 records across 19 countries and territories, 1891–2025.

Etisus laevimanus · GBIF taxon key 2227766

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.

12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18912025

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where smooth spooner has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for smooth spooner. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Japan 430
United States 21
Palau 5
Micronesia 4
Australia 3
Thailand 3
Fiji 2
India 2
Taiwan 2
Indonesia 1
British Indian Ocean Territory 1
Kiribati 1
Myanmar 1
New Caledonia 1
Philippines 1
Saudi Arabia 1
Singapore 1
Vietnam 1
Samoa 1
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.