Evidence found
73 records across 2 countries and territories, 1965–2002.
Euphlyctis ehrenbergii · GBIF taxon key 2430515
Where has the Arabian Five-fingered Frog been recorded?
Euphlyctis ehrenbergii occurrence evidence comes from 73 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1965 to 2002. Most records come from Saudi Arabia.
- 73 records
- 2 places
- 7 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: September.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: September. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19652002
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Arabian Five-fingered Frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Arabian Five-fingered Frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 68 | |
| Yemen | 5 |
Related animals
Others in the family Dicroglossidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.