Evidence found
87 records across 8 countries and territories, 2004–2026.
Eupholidoptera schmidti · GBIF taxon key 5976815
Where has the Schmidt's Marbled Bush-cricket been recorded?
Eupholidoptera schmidti occurrence evidence comes from 87 records in 8 countries and territories, from 2004 to 2026. Most records come from Croatia.
- 87 records
- 8 places
- 15 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
6 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
20042026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Schmidt's Marbled Bush-cricket has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Schmidt's Marbled Bush-cricket. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 51 | |
| Italy | 16 | |
| Austria | 12 | |
| Slovenia | 3 | |
| Serbia | 2 | |
| Albania | 1 | |
| Montenegro | 1 | |
| North Macedonia | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Tettigoniidae.
Great Green Bush Cricket
50,907 records
Dark Bush Cricket
33,196 records
Roesel's Bush Cricket
11,348 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.