Evidence found
13 records across 1 countries and territories, 1993–2009.
Euphydryas asiatica · GBIF taxon key 10246236
Where has the Euphydryas asiatica been recorded?
Euphydryas asiatica occurrence evidence comes from 13 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1993 to 2009. Most records come from Kazakhstan.
- 13 records
- 1 places
- 2 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Euphydryas asiatica has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Euphydryas asiatica. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Kazakhstan | 13 |
Related animals
Others in the family Nymphalidae.
Red Admiral
289,066 records
Peacock
266,474 records
Speckled Wood
222,217 records
Meadow Brown
218,227 records
Small Tortoiseshell
188,007 records
Painted Lady
130,644 records
Small Heath
123,072 records
Gatekeeper
109,317 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.