Evidence found
134 records across 6 countries and territories, 1948–2026.
Fulica ardesiaca · GBIF taxon key 2474383
Where has the Slate-colored Coot been recorded?
Fulica ardesiaca occurrence evidence comes from 134 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1948 to 2026. Most records come from Peru.
- 134 records
- 6 places
- 31 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19482026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Slate-colored Coot has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Slate-colored Coot. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Rallidae.
Eurasian Coot
871,365 records
Eurasian Moorhen
489,674 records
American Coot
28,854 records
Sora
3,667 records
White-breasted Waterhen
1,568 records
Australasian Swamphen
1,229 records
Dusky Moorhen
919 records
Western Swamphen
694 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.