What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Walter Verheyen’s Wood Mouse been recorded?

Hylomyscus walterverheyeni occurrence evidence comes from 11 records in 1 countries and territories, from 2001 to 2001. Most records come from Central African Republic.

MammaliaRodentiaMuridaeHylomyscus

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

11 records across 1 countries and territories, 2001–2001.

Hylomyscus walterverheyeni · GBIF taxon key 10048974

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.

1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

one-off describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Where Walter Verheyen’s Wood Mouse has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Walter Verheyen’s Wood Mouse. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Central African Republic 11

Related animals

Others in the family Muridae.

house mouse
house mouse
26,983 records
black rat
black rat
11,025 records
Coucha Rat
Coucha Rat
6,522 records
Yellow-necked Mouse
Yellow-necked Mouse
4,544 records
Jackson's Praomys
3,065 records
African Arvicanthis
African Arvicanthis
3,051 records
Typical Lemniscomys
Typical Lemniscomys
2,443 records
Gracile Tateril
2,200 records
Record pattern: one-off
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.