Evidence found
11,030 records across 6 countries and territories, 1919–2026.
Lanius bucephalus · GBIF taxon key 2492850
Where has the Bull-headed Shrike been recorded?
Lanius bucephalus occurrence evidence comes from 11,030 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1919 to 2026. Most records come from South Korea.
- 11,030 records
- 6 places
- 39 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-20. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19192026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Bull-headed Shrike has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Bull-headed Shrike. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Laniidae.
Red-backed Shrike
299,694 records
Great Gray Shrike
298,633 records
Woodchat Shrike
7,803 records
Lesser Gray Shrike
6,318 records
Brown Shrike
1,364 records
Long-tailed Shrike
908 records
Isabelline Shrike
866 records
Southern Fiscal
739 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.