Evidence found
229 records across 4 countries and territories, 1916–2026.
Leiocephalus schreibersii · GBIF taxon key 5224791
Where has the Red-sided Curly-tailed Lizard been recorded?
Leiocephalus schreibersii occurrence evidence comes from 229 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1916 to 2026. Most records come from Dominican Republic.
- 229 records
- 4 places
- 28 years recorded
- Squamata class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
8 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19162026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Red-sided Curly-tailed Lizard has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Red-sided Curly-tailed Lizard. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Dominican Republic | 138 | |
| Haiti | 85 | |
| Bahamas | 3 | |
| United States | 3 |
Related animals
Others in the family Leiocephalidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.