Evidence found
238 records across 2 countries and territories, 1990–2024.
Lophuromys laticeps · GBIF taxon key 11595772
Where has the Albertine Rift Brush-furred Rat been recorded?
Lophuromys laticeps occurrence evidence comes from 238 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2024. Most records come from Burundi.
- 238 records
- 2 places
- 5 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
5 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19902024
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Albertine Rift Brush-furred Rat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Albertine Rift Brush-furred Rat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Muridae.
house mouse
26,983 records
black rat
11,025 records
Coucha Rat
6,522 records
Yellow-necked Mouse
4,544 records
Jackson's Praomys
3,065 records
African Arvicanthis
3,051 records
Typical Lemniscomys
2,443 records
Gracile Tateril
2,200 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.