Evidence found
451 records across 13 countries and territories, 1905–2026.
Martes flavigula · GBIF taxon key 5218844
Where has the yellow-throated marten been recorded?
Martes flavigula occurrence evidence comes from 451 records in 13 countries and territories, from 1905 to 2026. Most records come from South Korea.
- 451 records
- 13 places
- 50 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: January.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: January. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19052026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where yellow-throated marten has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for yellow-throated marten. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| South Korea | 154 | |
| Nepal | 66 | |
| Malaysia | 56 | |
| Indonesia | 46 | |
| India | 32 | |
| Laos | 22 | |
| China | 18 | |
| Cambodia | 18 | |
| Myanmar | 10 | |
| Thailand | 9 | |
| Vietnam | 9 | |
| Taiwan | 8 | |
| Bhutan | 3 |
Related animals
Others in the family Mustelidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.