Evidence found
20 records across 1 countries and territories, 2022–2023.
Megaloglossus azagnyi · GBIF taxon key 8259533
Where has the Western Woermann's Fruit Bat been recorded?
Megaloglossus azagnyi occurrence evidence comes from 20 records in 1 countries and territories, from 2022 to 2023. Most records come from Togo.
- 20 records
- 1 places
- 2 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Western Woermann's Fruit Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Western Woermann's Fruit Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Togo | 20 |
Related animals
Others in the family Pteropodidae.
Gambian Epauletted Fruit Bat
1,020 records
Ethiopian Epauletted Fruit Bat
946 records
Lesser Epauletted Fruit Bat
829 records
Southern Blossom Bat
749 records
Palau Flying Fox
386 records
Straw-coloured fruit bat
272 records
Indian Flying Fox
175 records
Comoro Rousette
89 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.