Evidence found
95 records across 1 countries and territories, 2006–2014.
Mormopterus francoismoutoui · GBIF taxon key 7440669
Where has the Reunion Little Mastiff Bat been recorded?
Mormopterus francoismoutoui occurrence evidence comes from 95 records in 1 countries and territories, from 2006 to 2014. Most records come from ZZ.
- 95 records
- 1 places
- 3 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Reunion Little Mastiff Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Reunion Little Mastiff Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| ZZ | 95 |
Related animals
Others in the family Molossidae.
Mexican free-tailed bat
11,675 records
Velvety free-tailed bat
4,044 records
Little Free-tailed Bat
2,624 records
Angolan free-tailed bat
1,792 records
Seychelles Free-tailed Bat
324 records
Natal Free-tailed Bat
229 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.