Evidence found
219 records across 1 countries and territories, 1929–1929.
Notopteris macdonaldii · GBIF taxon key 2432985
Where has the Fijian Long-tailed Fruit Bat been recorded?
Notopteris macdonaldii occurrence evidence comes from 219 records in 1 countries and territories, from 1929 to 1929. Most records come from Fiji.
- 219 records
- 1 places
- 1 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: March.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: March. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Fijian Long-tailed Fruit Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Fijian Long-tailed Fruit Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Fiji | 219 |
Related animals
Others in the family Pteropodidae.
Gambian Epauletted Fruit Bat
1,020 records
Ethiopian Epauletted Fruit Bat
946 records
Lesser Epauletted Fruit Bat
829 records
Southern Blossom Bat
749 records
Palau Flying Fox
386 records
Straw-coloured fruit bat
272 records
Indian Flying Fox
175 records
Comoro Rousette
89 records
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.