Evidence found
605 records across 8 countries and territories, 1909–2019.
Occidozyga lima · GBIF taxon key 2430335
Where has the Rough-skinned Puddle Frog been recorded?
Occidozyga lima occurrence evidence comes from 605 records in 8 countries and territories, from 1909 to 2019. Most records come from Myanmar.
- 605 records
- 8 places
- 36 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19092019
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Rough-skinned Puddle Frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Rough-skinned Puddle Frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Myanmar | 281 | |
| China | 73 | |
| Thailand | 66 | |
| Laos | 60 | |
| Vietnam | 60 | |
| Cambodia | 47 | |
| Indonesia | 16 | |
| Hong Kong | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Dicroglossidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.