Evidence found
235 records across 3 countries and territories, 1910–1990.
Onychodactylus fischeri · GBIF taxon key 5218338
Where has the Fischer's clawed salamander been recorded?
Onychodactylus fischeri occurrence evidence comes from 235 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1910 to 1990. Most records come from North Korea.
- 235 records
- 3 places
- 5 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19101990
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Fischer's clawed salamander has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Fischer's clawed salamander. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| North Korea | 228 | |
| South Korea | 4 | |
| Russia | 3 |
Related animals
Others in the family Hynobiidae.
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.