Evidence found
2 records across 1 countries and territories, 2012–2012.
Oriolus melanotis · GBIF taxon key 2488956
Where has the Timor Oriole been recorded?
Oriolus melanotis occurrence evidence comes from 2 records in 1 countries and territories, from 2012 to 2012. Most records come from Indonesia.
- 2 records
- 1 places
- 1 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
1 month reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
one-off describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Timor Oriole has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Timor Oriole. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Oriolidae.
Eurasian Golden Oriole
55,555 records
Black-naped Oriole
5,290 records
Black-hooded Oriole
1,064 records
African Black-headed Oriole
784 records
African Golden Oriole
364 records
Western Black-headed Oriole
245 records
Hooded Pitohui
95 records
Indian Golden Oriole
89 records
Record pattern: one-off
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.