Evidence found
255 records across 3 countries and territories, 1914–2007.
Penthetor lucasii · GBIF taxon key 2432933
Where has the Lucas's Short-nosed Fruit Bat been recorded?
Penthetor lucasii occurrence evidence comes from 255 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1914 to 2007. Most records come from Malaysia.
- 255 records
- 3 places
- 13 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: September.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: September. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19142007
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Lucas's Short-nosed Fruit Bat has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Lucas's Short-nosed Fruit Bat. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Pteropodidae.
Gambian Epauletted Fruit Bat
1,020 records
Ethiopian Epauletted Fruit Bat
946 records
Lesser Epauletted Fruit Bat
829 records
Southern Blossom Bat
749 records
Palau Flying Fox
386 records
Straw-coloured fruit bat
272 records
Indian Flying Fox
175 records
Comoro Rousette
89 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.