Evidence found
3 records across 2 countries and territories, 1978–2026.
Phelsuma borbonica · GBIF taxon key 2447425
Where has the Reunion Day Gecko been recorded?
Phelsuma borbonica occurrence evidence comes from 3 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1978 to 2026. Most records come from Réunion.
- 3 records
- 2 places
- 3 years recorded
- Squamata class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
one-off describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Reunion Day Gecko has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Reunion Day Gecko. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Gekkonidae.
Common House Gecko
8,148 records
Sad Gecko
6,537 records
Turkish Gecko
3,559 records
Cosmopolitan House Gecko
2,716 records
Stump-Toed Gecko
2,646 records
Ocean Gecko
1,556 records
Tokay gecko
814 records
Pelagic Gecko
743 records
Record pattern: one-off
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.