Evidence found
48 records across 5 countries and territories, 1965–2011.
Phrynobatrachus francisci · GBIF taxon key 2430143
Where has the Puddle Frog been recorded?
Phrynobatrachus francisci occurrence evidence comes from 48 records in 5 countries and territories, from 1965 to 2011. Most records come from Ghana.
- 48 records
- 5 places
- 6 years recorded
- Amphibia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: May.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: May. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19652011
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Puddle Frog has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Puddle Frog. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 35 | |
| Burkina Faso | 10 | |
| Central African Republic | 1 | |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | |
| Senegal | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Phrynobatrachidae.
Peters' River Frog
317 records
Golden Puddle Frog
292 records
São Tomé Puddle Frog
231 records
Vissoke River Frog
11 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.