Evidence found
170 records across 9 countries and territories, 1881–2022.
Physiculus fulvus · GBIF taxon key 2417217
Where has the Hakeling been recorded?
Physiculus fulvus occurrence evidence comes from 170 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1881 to 2022. Most records come from United States.
- 170 records
- 9 places
- 45 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: September.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: September. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18812022
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Hakeling has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Hakeling. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 82 | |
| Curaçao | 45 | |
| ZZ | 24 | |
| Bonaire | 8 | |
| Mexico | 6 | |
| Dominica | 2 | |
| Brazil | 1 | |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | |
| Venezuela | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Moridae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.