Evidence found
141 records across 10 countries and territories, 1907–2026.
Pitta moluccensis · GBIF taxon key 2489520
Where has the Blue-winged Pitta been recorded?
Pitta moluccensis occurrence evidence comes from 141 records in 10 countries and territories, from 1907 to 2026. Most records come from Singapore.
- 141 records
- 10 places
- 38 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
7 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19072026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Blue-winged Pitta has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Blue-winged Pitta. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 64 | |
| Thailand | 53 | |
| Malaysia | 15 | |
| Indonesia | 2 | |
| United States | 2 | |
| Brunei | 1 | |
| Canada | 1 | |
| India | 1 | |
| Taiwan | 1 | |
| Vietnam | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Pittidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.