Evidence found
28 records across 2 countries and territories, 2009–2011.
Pomacentrus micronesicus · GBIF taxon key 7656252
Where has the Micronesian Damselfish been recorded?
Pomacentrus micronesicus occurrence evidence comes from 28 records in 2 countries and territories, from 2009 to 2011. Most records come from Timor-Leste.
- 28 records
- 2 places
- 3 years recorded
- — class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Micronesian Damselfish has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Micronesian Damselfish. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Timor-Leste | 25 | |
| Marshall Islands | 3 |
Related animals
Others in the family Pomacentridae.
Sergeant Major
38,799 records
Brown chromis
32,221 records
Yellowtail damselfish
28,071 records
Pacific Gregory
10,777 records
Johnston Damselfish
9,205 records
Vanderbilt's Chromis
8,458 records
Ocellate Damselfish
8,249 records
Dick's Damselfish
8,015 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.