Evidence found
39 records across 3 countries and territories, 1927–2026.
Psilopogon faiostrictus · GBIF taxon key 7360840
Where has the Green-eared Barbet been recorded?
Psilopogon faiostrictus occurrence evidence comes from 39 records in 3 countries and territories, from 1927 to 2026. Most records come from Thailand.
- 39 records
- 3 places
- 16 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
6 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19272026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Green-eared Barbet has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Green-eared Barbet. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Megalaimidae.
Blue-throated Barbet
829 records
Coppersmith Barbet
659 records
Lineated Barbet
182 records
Blue-eared Barbet
143 records
Great Barbet
115 records
Taiwan Barbet
110 records
Gold-whiskered Barbet
80 records
Golden-throated Barbet
70 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.