What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Psychoda fasciata been recorded?

Psychoda fasciata occurrence evidence comes from 59 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1919 to 1993. Most records come from Trinidad & Tobago.

InsectaDipteraPsychodidaePsychoda

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

59 records across 2 countries and territories, 1919–1993.

Psychoda fasciata · GBIF taxon key 1639992

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: November.

9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

historical describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: November. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

19191993

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Psychoda fasciata has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Psychoda fasciata. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Trinidad & Tobago 57
Saint Lucia 1

Related animals

Others in the family Psychodidae.

Moth Fly
Moth Fly
480 records
Sergentomyia schwetzi
267 records
Phlebotomus papatasi
Phlebotomus papatasi
61 records
Sergentomyia africana
13 records
Phlebotomus neglectus
9 records
Sergentomyia minuta
7 records
Sergentomyia inermis
1 records
Record pattern: historical
Historical records with no recent record in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.